This movie started out really strong with a very long take
of Candice Rialson’s tits. Then it escalates downhill…into a story.
The plot is dumb (no surprise). A jiggle flick with horrid
acting. So bad you wonder how it isn’t replicated in movies today (in the
no-budget jiggle world). The story is of a woman who marries for money. And she
teaches her children to do the same. When the man doesn’t pony up or they
discover that the guy is not worth much (monetarily) they murder him. Simple
enough.
I think the lesson in storytelling here is…you can tell any
story, put some tits in it, and you should be fine. Also, men have no radar
when it comes to marrying a woman and her 3 grown..I mean in their 20’s,
daughters. None of which register a job. Though to the mother’s credit, it is simply
to entice the dumb-ass to rape one of them. Speaking of rape…I think Rialson’s
lot in life was to portray rape victim. Not even a victim, just…if you ever
needed a person who appears to almost get rape and shows tits…she’s your girl. It
nearly happens twice here. Wait, I
take that back…three times if you count the two attempts by a retarded
Lenny-like “Of Mice and Men” type.
Considering this wasn’t a Roger Corman production, I would say she found a
niche market.
Film fucking is weird to stage. There’s a scene where the
red-headed daughter is clearly self-conscious of her body. Her elbow hides her
nipples the entire time. Even as they’re humping. It’s awkward.
I would check out this movie simply because the segments
between scenes are odd. The acting is so terrible it doesn’t help the
exposition. I’m trying to imagine what it looked like on paper that would
warrant someone not saying anything. Transcribed from movie:
EXT. BACKYARD - DUSK
Man chops at wood with an ax. A neighbor appears, who
appears nervous.
Man 1: Mr. Stritch, eh…er…you ready to listen?
STRITCH: Alright, what’s on your mind.
Man 1: You and me, we got a secret.
STRITCH: Now what kind of secret have we got?
Man 1: Well, it’s about your dear departed wife…Jenny? I saw
her drown.
Stritch moves closer to the neighbor.
STRITCH: Is that a fact?
MAN: Yeah. I saw you out on the lake that day in a rowboat.
And I guess she got tired and tried to get into the boat? And I saw you…push
her under with the oar! But I…uh…I saw the whole thing…Harold. But I didn’t
tell nobody. Because I figured…you and me, we can do some business.
STRITCH: Where were you?
Man 1: I was asleep in the weeds, y’know…the night before.
And I heard…uh…all that splashing. And it woke me up out of a sound hangover.
STRITCH: Alright, alright, alright rummy, waddya’ want?
Man 1: Ah Hell! I’m just a hobo. I’ll take anything you can
give me.
STRITCH: Alright you go up into the house, you got a deal.
Man turns to leave. Stritch raises the axe, brings it down
on him. Then hits him with the business end again. And again.
END OF SCENE
I guess..the acting was so great, they kept this in a
two-shot. Up until the murder. Anyway, on paper, it doesn’t seem too bad. It’s
just that they play it for the highest emotion possible. They don’t even
attempt to hide the fact they are acting. The lines are read…BIG! It almost
felt that the director wanted bigger.
It does bum me
out watching movies like these, since…those “girls” are now in their 60’s. And
in the exploitation world, it’s crushing to the loins.
No comments:
Post a Comment