I was listening to the Nerdist podcast with Chris Hardwick.
A very interesting one on Jodie Foster. I share a similar wonder and confusion
as she does for social media. She’s fairly clueless on what goes on, but she
seems to be fine with the ignorance. What I also picked up in their
conversation is that the new technology of filmmaking while newly presented for
awe, seems to have this thing about it as to be the only choice of movie
makers. In other words, why are people in such a hurry to embrace the
technology that isn’t proven yet, just because it’s the latest and greatest.
All these so-called new movie makers embrace digital capture
because it is what is readily available to them. They could shoot a movie on a
phone, and some have. But that doesn’t mean it’s right for the story. People
are jamming every type of story into the new digital technology simply because
it’s cheaper. There are no artistic choices when it comes to that (in the
pocketbooks of the studios anyway). So a few cinematographers are attempting to
crack that code. For some reason. They’re trying to mimic a craft that already
exists. For what purpose other than to circumvent…??? IF it’s purely an
economical choice than state that instead of your technology is better. No…it’s
what you can afford.
I had this conversation with the guy who I bought film from.
He’s in his late 50’s and still refers to his export as “we’re going to first
screen our movie in 1080.” This is a guy for which technology has bypassed him.
Which is confounding considering I always had a theory that people who shot on
film did their research. Or at the very least, don’t speak at all. I don’t mind
ignorance at all. I mind people talking themselves aloud with false information
and arguing with me about it, when I’ve got more experience.
The interview had me nodding my head repeatedly at Foster’s
viewpoint of how enamored we are of the new. Some would probably point out the
technology she has in her hand in terms of getting things done, but it sort of
dawned on me…her sole purpose in life is to get rid of clutter. Things that
take up space and distract to take away the main idea…to make movies.
She professed to loving movies to a degree of which she gets
physically ill when they’re made wrong. Which, obviously, is a subjective
thing. But I think what she was speaking about was craft. There is so much out
there these days, in terms of media. Videos of everything can be posted and it
clogs up the system (clutter). It seems to Foster, people never figured out if
they SHOULD make a certain movie only that they just do it. Which I applaud
that they do. But to pass yourself off with the title that is on par with
Coppola, John Ford, Billy Wilder or Scorsese is ridiculous. That’s why I always
do a “directed by” credit rather than a “director” credit. It’s not low
self-esteem, it’s respect for the ones who are so close to its mastery. YOU
most certainly don’t deserve it.
I really liked listening to Jodie, as I grew up watching her
in movies. She’s taken some wild parts, but really smart roles. I always
considered her a very smart person (Yale graduate), but in her self-effacing
way, it was a survival skill she’s learned through the years of growing up in
the movie business.
This is a great listen if you get a chance to hear it.
Good point: it's good that more people can make a film, but it's a question of if they SHOULD. The real problem is WHY do the masses enjoy the BS on the internet? Probably to not feel alone
ReplyDelete