What is genius?
It’s hard to pinpoint the decade to which Steve Jobs had
foresight of the universe. But if you think about how you decide the effects of
human behavior, the rest of us are just attempting to catch up with Steve Jobs.
Though fortunate not to have to skate that mental line.
Aside from the technology that permeates our society today,
it’s near impossible to see this world that doesn’t have an Apple product. In
fact, I’m typing from my MacBook Pro. One of the last models conceived by Jobs
before his death.
The idea of someone so intelligent, they cease to function
speaking and dealing with the public to a level common sense understanding. The
most frustrating of it all is attempting to float in the wake of it. What
exactly was Jobs’s gift? I believe this movie argues that it was to see the
potential. Not an engineer or a designer, what he lapped up was…um…style. P.T.
Barnum knew it. The product and culture was half the battle. What separates
this movie from the other Jobs projects, I think, is that Michael Fassbender
(who plays Steve Jobs) gets the calculated, somewhat humorous, otherwise cruel
mystery man behind the technology that did essentially change a part of the
world. Andy Warhol’s Factory was similar. Artists in residency would craft the
work, Warhol would sign off on it. If you’re the artist, this could prove to be
frustrating…as was the case for Steve Wozniak (an amazingly reserved Seth
Rogen)…the designer of the Apple II that was the basis of Mac’s greatest
successes. Jobs is unable (or stubbornly denies) to accept how great a
contribution Woz’s designs were. Though I got the sense that most Mac cultist
would credit him over Jobs. The question being without Jobs would any of this
be possible? Who knows. They do acknowledge the chain does go up. For instance,
having John Sculley be the C.E.O. (Jeff Daniels). A marketing head honcho
recruited from PepsiCo to head Apple. He is the business face of Jobs’s wild
free-spirit ways. Which is the impression, but not the man. Sculley is the “suit”
that hounds Jobs recklessness. Unable to see the method through the madness, he
is a traditional “company man” whose relationship with Jobs takes on a larger
role, once we realize Jobs’s past.
I often think about these things, since sometimes talent is
discovering what is added to what to get something good. In this case, Jobs is
compared to the conductor of an orchestra. He seems perfectly happy in the role
of shuffling engineers, software developers to blend a clean machine. Though,
what gets lost in the shuffle, is his interaction with people. In particular,
his long time marketing partner Joanna Hoffman played BRILLANTLY by Kate
Winslet. The drama is played to the extent to which Joanna finally lays it out
in plain English, Jobs lacks humanity BUT knows what humans want. The massive
flaw in his design. Which is again illustrated in two decades dodging a
daughter that only wants to know more about her father.
I love this movie. Expertly directed by Danny Boyle from a
script by Aaron Sorkin, this movie, for all the dry info, moves. Those who’ve
complained about it being a filmed play…go fuck yourself. This was as visually
stunning as any landscape in “The Revenant” (piece of shit). And the drama is
more palatable without bear rape. This movie’s greatest accomplishment is that
after all the oddball t.v. movies and straight-to-video release, this one had
the acting chops and idiosyncrasies to make it fascinating. Moves like a rock
concert, and a shame it didn’t win Best Picture. Though I have no doubt, a
movie about child molestation in the Catholic church is far more important than
a man who has social interaction issues.
Watch this movie if you can.
No comments:
Post a Comment