One of the most obvious yet, diabolically challenging but
deceptively simple sequence to shoot are conversations in daylight while
maintain orientation. Even big movies suffer this issue. The best way to
describe it is to make sure people are facing each other when they are talking.
People not looking at each other while talking is off-putting and weird. Done
for effect (such as when Kubrick intentionally does it) it is cool. Mistakenly
doing it, is bush league. I kick myself for being this far ahead of making
movies and still stumbling on this.
The wrong effect is a guy faces on direction to speak to
someone, then cuts away, then it cuts back to the guy…there’s a shift. You may
not see it, but you feel it. It’s a crushing thing in editing when things are
inverted with performances from one take, that don’t work with another.
Frustrating to say the least. On thing you can do, is to flop the frame.
Basically flip it to match the direction to which the actor is speaking
towards. Unfortunately, I had him stand ¾ sideways wrong direction, and also,
the sun would then also be on his wrong side. This IS something people will
see.
Sometimes you can get away with it. For instance, Michael
Bay has his actors constantly backlit. If you edit back and forth, it doesn’t
appear too odd, but if you stop to think about it, that would mean there are
two suns in that world. Movie magic for the sake of vanity is fine. Everyone
can get aboard when actors look good.
Typically, productions tend to do one master wide shot to
include to two people just to free you up to orientation. I hate using this
crutch, because it always looks weird. A two shot is the dullest thing in the
world. Unless you have great dialogue, it’s usually a boring frame. It also
flattens out the cinema screen. We fake three dimensions. Two shots are
reserved mostly for stage.
Anyway, I’m having issues now with matching looks. Unfortunately,
I didn’t cover the entire scene with full takes. The beats are long, and I
didn’t know how much more film we were going to burn through. Having a script
supervisor may’ve been nice on this day. However, even on the feature I was
shooting, my mind was so melted from the hours, I doubt her suggestions
would’ve sound anything less than Charlie Brown’s teacher.
I’ve heard crazier stories about visual effects fixes that
have NOTHING to do with the movie itself. On one movie, there were blemishes
being removed, close up of actor’s crow’s feet removed (which, by the way,
isn’t even someone you would consider vain). If I’d flip the actresses side of
the screen and have her face the opposite direction, I’d also have to erase her
shirt (as it has words on it). Crazy world, huh?
Anyway, it bothers me a little, but not enough to go nuts.
The performances worked, so I’m good with that. I do lament about more
technical stuff. Like had I had permits, and a bigger crew, I’d take the harsh
sun off the actors and bring in a reflector. I regret more about not bringing
in something to pop out and make it look better. I regret not having the lens
filtration to knock down the grittiness of being two stops overexposed. Also,
that I didn’t get a tighter close up so I could save the scenes. I frequently
live a world of two movies. Happy with a lot of it, just gutted when it goes a
little off.
But looking through this cut again, I am so very happy about
the fact that there are workable moments. And now to fine tune, and give it to
people to decide if these mistakes bother them. I think it’s the bigger picture
that ultimately counts.
No comments:
Post a Comment