Women In It For Other Women?

There's been a huge push to include more women into the forefront of filmmaking. I've always been a champion of that, and was rather curious why that wasn't always the case. Women pick up language quicker in men. And have a clearer vocabulary when it comes to emotions. Though they lack certain logic skills, movies weren't built on logic. They were built on emotions. Very few people know movie making was dominated by women of the past. Then when it started making money, dudes took that shit. It didn't change much. It's just that under-reporting female contribution to Hollywood became a thing. Then it became that you were too afraid to go against the feminist. But what these people didn't really know, and will never admit, is that women subjugated other women in Hollywood. As the old saying goes "women would rule the world, if they didn't hate each other" Again, with emotion, women tend not to be adjusted for that. The ones who did break through seemed to have acted like men. Sherry Lansing and Amy Pascal to name a couple of heavy hitters. They played in the perceived "Man's world" They were just as guilty of being shallow and market savvy as men. They would (and had to) guide a film based on public tastes. And most wanted beautiful young people. The risk they took to cast older people that no one wanted to see were outliers. And they knew it. They knew things like...once a woman gives birth to a child, she is no longer seen as sexy. They knew it. And they were women. Because, they too, are financially responsible. This obviously created a dead spot inside them that which exists in most nurturing women. Their sense of timing (except when going to a social event) is impeccable. I think they have better rhythm them men. Pacing, and emotional manipulation. They are better than men in this regard. So, why the talk of women being underrepresented? Because if they didn't, women wouldn't have anything to nag about.